26 February 2011

One policy fits all

Dr Grumble has a Japanese doctor working with him. His name is Ren. The other day he asked Dr Grumble why there are so many parks in London. According to Ren, there are no parks in Tokyo. A quick Google search suggests that this might not quite be true and a look at Google maps seems to show a few patches of green in Tokyo. But a comparison with a map of London suggests that we do have much more green space. Ren asked why. Dr Grumble had to think on his feet. He told Ren it was to do with common land. Ren's face looked blank. Perhaps they don't have such a concept in Japan. Grumble needed a more understandable explanation. Quickly he made up a story about the king needing somewhere to go hunting. Ren nodded. That was something he could grasp.

Recently Dr Grumble went to his local forest to protest. He didn't want to risk the sale of the woods near his home to a private company. A forest is not worth much. Not as a forest anyway. But if you could sell it to be used for something else it would be worth quite a bit more. So, if the local wood were to fall into the hands of a private company, the shareholders would want to make money out of it. You can be sure that they would chip away at any regulations preventing them from doing this. They might not succeed tomorrow or in five years or in ten years but the woods need to be preserved forever. The likelihood is that repeated planning applications would eventually be met with approval for the odd plot of land to be sold off for, say, housing. In this way, bit by bit, over many years the woods would disappear. Once gone they would be gone forever.

A London park which belongs to the community.

Over the years how many people have fought for the green spaces in London? Dr Grumble has no idea. One thing is certain: if it had been left to the market the green spaces in London would have gone long ago. People out to make money have been been prevented from concreting over our parks and commons. That's why Grumble did his bit for posterity and protested in the woods.

And who knows? Maybe our London parks have made us money. Maybe that is partly why Japanese tourists like to visit London. Maybe the quality of life our parks and gardens bring even attracts bankers to London. Perhaps even they realise that there is more to life than money. We cannot know. And it doesn't matter. What matters is that we need these green spaces because we like them and governments have a duty to protect things of value to society especially when, once those things are gone, they are gone forever.

These fundamental principles don't just apply to the parks and gardens that we all cherish. There are other things in England that many of us value. There are others things that will be gone forever if we lose them. There are other things that we need to fight to protect. Just as some of us fought to protect the woodlands.

Here's an article from Sky News, slightly modified, to bring home something else we are about to lose forever:

Ministers have outlined proposals that will allow private owners to manage land hospitals previously owned by the Forestry Commission NHS. Some 15% of the forest NHS estate, worth an estimated £100m billion, is already being sold.

The latest consultation could lead to the sale of the remaining 85% owned by the Commission NHS, totalling 2,500 sq km 250 district general hospitals. Under the new proposals ancient woodland such as the Forest of Dean teaching hospitals such as Guys and St Thomas' could be designated 'heritage forestry' 'National Training Centres' and transferred to be run by a charitable trust.

Campaigners in the Forest of Dean Lambeth have vowed to fight any plans to privatise or restrict access to their woodland local hospital. Rich Daniels Dr Grumble from the Hands Off Our Forest Save Our NHS protest group, told Sky News the proposals raise more questions than they answer.

Commerically valuable forests hospitals will be leased to commercial operators for up to 150 years but under conditions that public benefits of the woods universal healthcare are preserved. Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman Health Secretary Andrew Lansley stressed the plans were not about selling off the forests NHS to the highest bidder. Ms Spelman Mr Lansley said: "State control of forests the NHS dates back to the First World War 1947, when needs were very different. "There's now no reason for the Government to be in the business of timber production healthcare and forest NHS management. "It's time for the Government to step back and allow those who are most involved with England's woodlands healthcare to play a much greater role in their future."

It would seem that the government has essentially one policy for everything. Everything should be privatised or charitised and government should take no responsibility for it. Government is no longer the custodian of things that we value. It is a new concept called the Big Society. What it really means is you are your own. Look after yourself and the things that you value because the government is not going to do it for you.

A London hospital which belongs to the community.

Why is the Labour Party not protesting? The answer is pretty obvious but if you can't work it out you may need the help of a Black Cat.


hyperCRYPTICal said...

The Witch Doctors Black Cat is very clever and I have left a comment there.

The Big Society - in principle, I would like to see a cohesive society return (where altruistically we help each other)- but I do not think that is what Dave has in mind.

I believe you are correct in that the real message is: "Look after yourself and things that you value because the government is not going to do it for you."

I do believe that if Labour had retained control, we would still be going down the same path - but covertly. If memory serves me well, in a previous post some time ago, you mentioned the implicit (but foolish, I think)trust we have/had in the Labour Party to look after the people - but they are no more interested in us than Dave and Nick.

Sad that.

Anna :o]

Anonymous said...

Do I smell the forest burning? There seem to be a problem with your blog.

Cockroach Catcher said...

Posted a link to your post.

The Cockroach Catcher

Anonymous said...

Did someone take down your latest posting? Do you want one of us to get it back up or were you making changes?

Dr Grumble said...

I took it down because I was not sure that the original author was happy for it to be posted and I was not able to contact him. It will be reposted if I can get his go ahead. I don't think he will mind but I want to be sure.

Anonymous said...

Phew,didn't think MI5 or GCHQ was that good.